On results of this research, some tips can be made for additional methods associated with disagreement resolution. In relevant literary works, fundamentally public expertise education (Openshaw, Mills, Adams, Durso, 1992), communications and you can problem solving studies (Clarke Greenberg, 1986; DeForest Hugles, 1992; A lot of time Adams, 2001) and you will behavioural strategy (Robin, Patrica, Moye, 1995; Energy, 1992) were used in training regarding argument solution. But not, intellectual behavioral cures had been good at ent off disagreement resolution feel (Hoyer, Fecht, Louterback Schneider, 2001; Spillane-Grieco, 2000). It attempts contributes that people can acquire a lot more fulfillment using their connections.
There are a few limitations which determine generalization of these abilities. Very first, the research try limited number of fellow member and you will attempt are employed from students. Thus, the fresh new samplecan not depict the adolescent. Second, parents-adolescents relationships are tested that with care about-statement measures and you can anly away from adolescents’ angle. Which steps will give limited facts about affairs. 3rd, individuals’ effect from the relation are examined specific duration of interaction, maybe not over the period.
Upcoming degree might be simulate the present analysis plus shot regarding folks of certain decades and you can people. Morever, mothers adolescents affairs will be examined playing with different ways particularly videotaped otherwise direct observance. Observational education you will definitely bring addiitional information on the particularly loved ones and you may parents’ perception throughout the loved ones can be regarded as for the further knowledge. This research might be frequent in certain times when you look at the a great longitudinal study which may offer a whole lot more practical overall performance.
Addis, J. Bernard, M. Elizabeth. (2002). Relationship changes and unreasonable values. Log out-of Rational-emotive and you may Intellectual Behavioural Cures, 20, 3-13.
Akbalik, G. (2001). Catiflma cozme olce inin gecerlik ve guvenirlik calismas>. (the study from legitimacy from reliability off Conflict Solution Level). Turk Psikolojik Dan>flma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, sixteen,7-thirteen
Clark, K. Greenberg, L. S. (1986). Differential ramifications of gestalt a couple of-couch intervention and you will troubleshooting inside solving desicional argument. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 33,11-fifteen.
Further mental intervention according to intellectual decisions theory will be used to individuals in order to be focus on its with impaired dating values and its particular negative effects to their conflict quality techniques and alter their buddygays impaired thinking
Cramer, D. (2004). Aftereffect of the latest harmful opinions disgareement viewpoints on the relationship fulfillment having aromantic lover or best friend. Therapy and you may Therapy, 77, 121-133.
Debord, J., Romans, S. C., Krieshok, T. (1996). Predictions dyadic adjustment out-of standard and matchmaking particular thinking. Record away from Psychology, 130, 263-280.
DeForest, P. Hughes, J.(1992). Treatments for mother or father-teenage disagreement using behavioural techonology education: research study. Diary off Informative Mental Appointment, step 3,281-301.
DiGuiseppe, Roentgen. Zee, C. (1986). A rational emotive idea from marital description and you will marital cures. Journal out-of Rational-emotive and you will Intellectual Behavioural Treatment, cuatro, 22-37.
Impractical thinking regarding health-related couples: Its link to criterion, requirements and you can pleasure
Eidelson, R. J. Epstein, Letter. (1982). Cognition and you can matchmaking maladjustment: Development of a measure of dysfunctional matchmaking values. Log away from Asking and you will Medical Mindset, fifty, 715-720.
Emmelkamp, P. Grams., Krol, B., Sanderman, Roentgen., Ruphan, Meters. (1987). The brand new assessment of matchmaking values for the marital framework. Identity and Private Distinctions, 8, 775-780.
Epstein, Letter., Baucom., D. H., Rankin, L. A. (1993). Therapy of relationship disagreement: an intellectual behavioural strategy. Systematic Psychology Remark, thirteen, 45-57.
Epstein, Letter., Finnegan, B. Bythell, D. (1979). Irrational opinions and you may perception of relationship conflict. Log out-of Asking and Clinical Mindset, 47, 608-610.
Epstein, Letter., Pretzer, J. L. Fleming, B. (1987). The newest character off cognitive assessment inside the care about-reports of relationship communications. Conclusion Treatment, 18, 51-69.
Eryuksel, A beneficial. (1996). Anne baba ve ergen iliflkilerinin condition cozme iletiflim becerileri biliflsel carptmalar ve aile yaps acsndan incelenmesi.(The investigation out-of family members family with respect to troubleshooting, correspondence experiences, intellectual distortion and friends construction). Yaynlanmamls Doktora Tezi. (Unpublished learn thesis) Ege Univeristesi.
